On The "Right To Sex"
Why sex positivity has little to do with the sex workers' right movement.
The amount of young men who have not had sex has tripled in the past decade. This is a statistic repeated by Mens’ Rights Activists and Feminists alike. Something is wrong. A solution regularly touted by well-meaning liberals, libertarians, and American “sex-positive feminists” is the legalization of sex work. Some go as far as to propose that the government should fund these services to disabled people and incels. This is ridiculous. Sex workers are not fodders to protect chaste women from incels. Sex is not a human right and this is a horrible way to advocate for sex workers.
As someone who has done community organizing in sex workers’ rights for the past five years, I’ve tried to inform myself as well as possible on the subject. I’ve read Laura Agustin, Bindel, bell hooks, and everything in between. Sex work should not be decriminalized on the premise of helping incels get laid. It should be decriminalized to protect the workers who participate in this industry. In fact, the American sex workers’ rights movement needs to have a major update on its talking points. Allies, you need to listen too.
The first step is to move beyond the conflation of “sex positivity” and sex workers’ rights. It's understandable why this talking point exists. The US is puritanical leads to its restriction of sex workers' rights. From an American perspective, these issues are intricately linked in ways they are not in Northern Europe and Japan. Yet I challenge us to think bigger than 90s third-wave liberal feminism.
There is also an interesting phenomenon. Inside the online sphere of sex workers’ rights exists sex workers who assert their insatiable sexual appetite in tandem with their activist careers. In Revolting Prostitutes, Smith & Mac dub this The Erotic Professional. This trope is occupied by college-educated attractive White Western sex workers. I’m not denying that they may like their jobs. I have nothing against sex positivity as a concept. I just wonder about the purpose in relation to this topic. These Erotic Professionals often have fanbases of other sex-positive 3rd wave feminists and sex-buying clientele–therefore there’s a certain chipperness required for it to work. Horny men don’t want to hear about trauma, poverty, and criminalization. If one were to talk about the often grueling reality of sex work, many ‘liberated’ feminists would be repulsed. I am asking, as I typically do, for nuance to return.
When sex positivity is centered it becomes a class issue and frankly, it ignores basic reality. The majority of sex workers are ambivalent about “sex positivity”. They are single mothers paying their bills. They are foster kids who aged out of the system. Queer people who have been kicked out of their homes. Migrants may owe smugglers a large amount of money or send cash to family back home. They probably don’t identify with the term “sex worker”. This is a reality that we cannot continue to ignore. It can and often is traumatizing. Many times at the hands of police but often at the hands of clients. There is often little to no sexual pleasure in it for those providing services, although there can be. The vast majority of people aren’t engaging in sex work as a feminist rebellion but rather as a means of survival. That’s fine too–we need to shift the narrative of being about sexual enjoyment to basic labor rights for society’s most marginalized. Even if that isn’t really all that sexy.
I am willing to wager that sex workers’ rights (and their restriction of them) have less to do with sex positivity than many think. There is little to no pushback about Gay men selling sex. There is little to no hysteria around Gay men selling sex. There is little to no moral debate about Gay men selling sex. Of course, gay men selling sex face criminalization however the level of patronization that women selling sex face is quite different. Nursing, retail, housekeeping, and school teaching are all feminized forms of labor. How much of the discrimination that sex workers face is due to controlling women’s labor rather than our sexuality?
As Mac & Smith say, you don’t have to love your job to want to keep your job. Let’s let go of the free love narrative and take on something more real. Something everyone can get behind and adopt.
Sex is powerful and many studies show that having a healthy sex life is integral to one's sense of self. Sex is still not a right. It is a privilege. Promising sexless young men the right to sex from sex workers is absurd. Let’s stop repeating it.
I do believe that sex positivity and being able to enjoy sex work (which a lot of people believe is not possible even though there are countless real life examples) deserves it’s place in the discussion about legalization, and even the “right to sex” or whatever should be taken into consideration, although it should not be the reason. The first and foremost reality is that decriminalization will make everything saver for everyone and that is the best reason to do it. Like what you are saying in the article, people want to keep their jobs and be able to do it securely, and they are adults who do not need other people to decide they can not do with their own body what they decide to do for whatever reason.
I might be what could fall under “erotic professional” and I do think that it’s great that we can enjoy it so much and see the positives that people love to ignore. However it’s unacceptable how degrading some other ladies and clients talk about the SW who aren’t in an as favorable position. My dad when he talked to me about my lifestyle was very insisted that I should always see it as a higher for of art and a healing experience for the client and while it’s ideal, some days you just want to zone out and get that bread, lol. You can’t always put all your energy and love into something and that’s ok. Sometimes a job is a job and not everyone can live in constant passion all the time. Too bad.
As for the incels, there is so much to unravel there. Of course SW should not be fodder, but if these men want to they will find their way, so we should have rules in place that the right people will be punished if women are harmed or disrespected. Also if people demand sexual services without much funds, ok, but then they do not get to comment on the looks of the provider. One of the things that concerns me most of the SW industry is pension.. I wish there was more security as we age.
The thing with most incel though is that they are not interested in SW. it’s not about sexual frustration. They want to be found attractive and get a sweet submissive gf who adores them and is a virgin. They don’t want “unpure” women who wouldn’t even look at them until they get their wallets out. Probably the same with rapists, they might enjoy the force and the violence, not the sexual service. And SW are not fodder for that indeed. So it wouldn’t solve anything. But one thing that legalization would do is give the power to the women. To make it safe to go to the police and not get in trouble yourself. And that’s what’s important.